A Comment on renaming of Gurgaon as Gurugram

My Comment on an article "Renaming Gurgaon as Gurugram indicates rustic imagination of Millennium City's political masters" published on economictimes.com Dated 15/04/2016.


"People (especially politicians) waste much of their time in changing names of streets and cities rather than concentrating on developmental projects. 

They think (or try to impress some of their people) that they are more patriotic than their predecessors by indulging in such activities.

But what they are doing is actually creating hatred and tension among people and disturb the normal life of public."

A Comment on Gurgaon becoming extremely not suitable for living

My comment on an article "Gurgaon on its death bed: Haphazard development causes severe water crisis" published in the Economic Times dated 02/02/2014 at 5:35 pm. 


"A very critical condition of cities. 

Urbanisation requires well planned administration by providing for sufficient water and sanitation facilities. 

Constructions should be allowed only after providing suitable means for enough water and amenities to the residents. There should be a well planned development with adequate water, sanitation, landscapes, trees and water spots. 

Now, the remedy lies in stopping all construction works and converting the spare land into gardens, greeneries and water spots by bringing water from rivers after turning the stale waters into usable water. Using sea water also as an alternative should be contemplated upon by bring sea water through canals to the cities and turning it into usable water."

A Comment on An Article "Paupers And Princes of Realty: How Gurgaon is Land of Both Crorepatis and Cowherds

My comment on an article in Economic Times " Paupers and Princes Of Realty" published on 17/02/2013 at 5 pm.

  People should be clever enough to reap fortunes out of circumstances like Kanwar who has made 20 crores out of the 38 lac he earned by sale of his farm land where as the other one spent all his money earned and became a pauper. Realty sector is really fortune maker for some people whereas it was a doom for others.


A further comment on same topic as a clarfication/reply to some comment:

 You see even if it was only 60 lac  all of it could not be spent for debt. A farmer can not have so much debt. Debts can be upto 10 lac or so. So it implies that he must have spent money for fulfilling lavish desires and irrelevant purposes. So he was not prudent.



Please reply to all my comments only at the space provided below for that purpose by navigating through side bar.