Comment on Rama's limitations in Ramayana

My comment on an article by Rajiv Barnala in Speaking Tree Blog dated 10/11/2012 at 6 pm

Venkat Acharya posted a response on Rajiv Barnala's blog Ramayana a Story without any Hole

"First of all, every one should know that God has taken the form of Rama with some limitations. He wanted to teach the common man how to live a good and pious life. For this purpose, he behaved like a common man with all emotions and limitations. Even though he was aware of all his supernatural and divinely powers, he practiced the simple life of a good king and and performed all his duties with human consciousness. He never displayed his divinity. We are forgetting this point and unnecessarily blaming God."

A Comment on Ram Jethmalani's Comment on "Rama Was A Bad Husband"

	A comment on Ram Jethmalani's comment in the Times of India edition dated  The Times Of India
	Dear Reader,
	Your comment on the article ''I don't like Ram, he was a bad husband: Jethmalani'' is now displayed on timesofindia.com.
	''Yes, indeed he was correct in saying that Rama was a bad husband because he put her to test of Agnipariksha and even after that he abandoned her to her fate. It was only due to Lav and Kush that he happens to meet her again and pleads for her return. But Sita does not return and ends her avatar. But simply because that Rama was not a good husband, you can't deny his divinity. He was a moral and example for purity and goodness. He cared for his father, mothers, brothers, his subjects and for his people always. You must know that he has taken avatar for the destruction of demons and for establishing peaceful and pleasant life to the mankind.''
	Thanks for sharing your thoughts, and keep up the good work!
	Regards,
	Team TOI